![]() I was particularly struck by a short piece by Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, who warns darkly that the Supreme Court is gearing up to rule that “free exercise of religion” justifies “an exemption from anti-discrimination laws.” Over on the secular left, the chorus of outrage has already begun. Most court observers expect a 6-3 decision in favor of Smith, with the court’s six conservatives delivering another religion-friendly ruling. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last December, and a decision could be forthcoming any time between now and next June, although later rather than sooner is probably the best bet. ![]() Represented by a Christian legal advocacy group called Alliance Defending Freedom, Smith brought her case to the Supreme Court on appeal from a 2-1 ruling against her by the U.S. Smith, a practicing Christian, finds same-sex marriage to be in conflict with the Bible and she draws the line at creating a site that celebrates it. The problem for her is expressing approval. Elenis and it concerns a Colorado website designer who refuses to design wedding sites in celebration of same-sex unions as Colorado non-discrimination law would have her do.Īccording to the website designer, Lorie Smith, she has no objection to doing other work for such couples, and if it’s a wedding site they want, she is quite prepared to refer them to another designer. ![]() I say this thinking especially of what will probably be the most important religion-related case of the court’s present term. One of the least attractive has been the open hostility of secularist sources faced with this development. ![]() One of the most attractive features of the Supreme Court in the last several years has been its generally friendly view of religion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |